Actually, I believe that for a brief period (around 2006) lmer did return p-values (chisq-based), but then 2006 is a long time ago...
If the question pertains p-values in the usual output of coef( summary( model ) ), I'll just mention that with doBy and pbkrtest you can do linest( model, diag(1, length(coef(model)) ) ) With the next release of doBy you do not need to specify the diag-stuff, but for now you have to. Cheers Søren |-----Original Message----- |From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] |On Behalf Of Ben Bolker |Sent: 9. november 2014 03:48 |To: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch |Subject: Re: [R] Lme4 Package Help! | |Doran, Harold <HDoran <at> air.org> writes: | |> |> Daniel |> |> Lmer has never returned p-values from a model summary; this is a |> well-known and discussed issue. You must have post-processed the data |> in some way to get the p-values. | | But it's worth noting that lmerTest does, and the way it works makes it |pretty hard to see that the results are not coming from vanilla lme4. If |this is what happened I wouldn't blame the OP for getting confused. | |______________________________________________ |R-help@r-project.org mailing list |https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help |PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting- |guide.html |and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.