No actually it is a quiet good paper! :) On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, John Kane <jrkrid...@inbox.com> wrote:
> +1 > I, originally, read it as a stringent criticism of the first paper. > > John Kane > Kingston ON Canada > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz > > Sent: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:12:43 +1200 > > To: cfly...@ncsu.edu > > Subject: Re: [R] VIF threshold implying multicollinearity > > > > > > On 27/07/15 13:36, Collin Lynch wrote: > > > >> The following sources discuss the issues generally and may be a goof > >> pointer to the literature ... > > > > <SNIP> > > > > I think that the foregoing merits fortune status! :-) > > > > cheers, > > > > Rolf > > > > -- > > Technical Editor ANZJS > > Department of Statistics > > University of Auckland > > Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > PLEASE do read the posting guide > > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > ____________________________________________________________ > FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and > family! > Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.