On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 5:12 PM Jeff Newmiller <jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us>
wrote:
Questions about compiling generally belong on R-devel.
Ok. Sorrx fpr the noise
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On August 22, 2015 7:51:39 AM PDT, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>I want to build R with an optimized BLAS library.
>My OS: Fedora 22
>Hardware: CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian
>CPU(s): 8 Thread(s) per core: 2 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel Model name:
>Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
>
>I am a little confused when it comes to choose a method and would like
>to hear your experiences. If I am right, I have 3 possibilities:
>- OpenBLAS: opensource and free, but I came across some posts
>describing seg faults issues and bugs. These posts are 2 years old and
>I wonder if it is still the case.
>- ATLAS: can't see any reason to not use it
>- Intel MKL: this is part of Intel Parallel Studio and is a paid
>software. Now, there is the MKL package distributed by
>Revolutionanalytics, but I am not certain how this can be distributed
>for free. Is there any kind of difference? In case of use of this
>package, do I need to install RRO or can I just build R from GNU
>against these libraries?
>
>Thank you for advices.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
