> On 11 Oct 2015, at 02:12 , Jeff Newmiller <jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > Sorry I missed the boat the first time, and while it looks like Peter is > getting closer I suspect that is not quite there either due to the T2 being > considered separate from T3 requirement.
Er, what do you mean by that? As far as I can tell, we're selecting the same observations: > teste[kp,] ID Group Var 1 3 T2 0.32 2 4 T3 1.59 3 1 T2 2.94 4 1 T2 3.23 5 1 T2 1.40 6 1 T2 1.62 7 1 T2 2.43 8 1 T2 2.53 9 1 T2 2.25 10 1 T3 1.66 11 1 T3 2.86 12 1 T3 0.53 13 1 T3 1.66 14 1 T3 3.24 15 1 T3 1.34 21 2 T2 2.00 22 2 T2 2.39 23 2 T2 1.65 24 2 T2 2.05 25 2 T2 2.75 26 2 T2 2.23 27 2 T2 1.39 28 2 T2 2.66 29 2 T2 1.05 30 2 T3 2.52 -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
