Would making it regular function %=>%, using "%" instead of quotes, work for you?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Adrian Dușa <dusa.adr...@unibuc.ro> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> [...] >> >> It never gets to evaluating it. It is not a legal R statement, so the > parser signals an error. >> If you want to pass arbitrary strings to a function, you need to put them > in quotes. > > I see. I thought it was parsed inside the function, but if it's parsed > before then quoting is the only option. > > > To Keith: no, I mean it like this "A + B => C" which is translated as: > "the union of A and B is sufficient for C" in set theoretic language. > > The "=>" operator means sufficiency, while "<=" means necessity. Quoting > the expression is good enough, I was just curious if the quotes could be > made redundant, somehow. > > Thank you both, > Adrian > > -- > Adrian Dusa > University of Bucharest > Romanian Social Data Archive > Soseaua Panduri nr.90 > 050663 Bucharest sector 5 > Romania > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.