[I’m really sorry if you receive this mail twice. I just noticed I had sent it 
from a different account that the one I signed up to the mailing list on and I 
don’t know if that means it will be filtered; at least I haven’t received it 
myself yet.]


I am playing around with continuation-passing style recursions and want to use 
the trampoline approach to avoiding too deep recursions. I want to do 
recursions on a tree so I cannot simply simulate a tail-recursion with a loop 
and need something else, and rather than simulating my own stack I want to use 
the method that solves this in general.

I cannot seem to get out of problems with the

  Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / 
options(expressions=)?
  Error during wrapup: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / 
options(expressions=)?

error, so I reduced the problem to just computing factorials to see if I could 
at least get it to work there, but here I get the problem as well, and in the 
example below I am completely stumped as to why.

trampoline <- function(thunk) {
    while (is.function(thunk)) thunk <- thunk()
    thunk
}

thunk_factorial <- function(n, continuation = identity, acc = 1) {
    force(continuation) # if I remove this line I get an error
    cat("call: ", n, " : ", acc, "\n") # same for this line
    if (n == 1) {
        continuation(acc)
    } else {
        make_thunk(thunk_factorial, n - 1, continuation, n * acc)
    }
}
trampoline(thunk_factorial(10000))

This version works for me. If I remove the “force(continuation)” it doesn’t — 
even though I never modify the contination in this function (in the tree I want 
to do recursion on I will have to). I get all the way down the simulated 
recursion to the final call of the continuation and then I get the error. So as 
far as I would expect I should just get the identity of the final accumulator 
at the end, but instead I get the error.

If I remove the cat-call I also get the error. That *really* puzzles me. What 
is cat doing that lets me complete the function when it is involved but not 
when I comment out that line?

There is clearly something about this infinite recursion error I am completely 
missing. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers
Thomas


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to