I don’t know… that was the behaviour I had yesterday, but on the laptop where I 
was doing the experiments I updated R from 3.2 to 3.3 earlier today and now the 
original make_thunk

make_thunk <- function(f, …) function() f(…)

also works for me.

I don’t know what else I can say to that :)

Cheers
Thomas




On 11 August 2016 at 23:05:29, Duncan Murdoch 
(murdoch.dun...@gmail.com<mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>) wrote:

On 10/08/2016 1:28 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 10/08/2016 1:10 PM, Thomas Mailund wrote:
>> That did the trick!
>>
>> I was so focused on not evaluating the continuation that I completely forgot 
>> that the thunk could hold an unevaluated value… now it seems to be working 
>> for all the various implementations I have been playing around with.
>>
>> I think I still need to wrap my head around *why* the forced evaluation is 
>> necessary there, but I will figure that out when my tired brain has had a 
>> little rest.
>
> The original version
>
> make_thunk <- function(f, ...) function() f(…)
>
> says to construct a new function whose body evaluates the expression
> f(...). It never evaluates f nor ... , so they don't get evaluated
> until the first time you evaluate that new function.
>
> My version containing list(...) forces evaluation of ... . It would
> have been even better to use
>
> make_thunk <- function(f, ...) { list(f, ...); function() f(…) }
>
> because that forces evaluation of both arguments.
>
> I suspect you would have problems with
>
> make_thunk <- function(f, ...) function() do.call(f, list(...))
>
> for exactly the same reasons as the original; I'm surprised that you
> found it appears to work.

I have done some experimentation, and am unable to reproduce the
behaviour you described. Using do.call() doesn't affect things.

Duncan Murdoch


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to