On 20/05/17 00:01, Jérémie Juste wrote:
Hello,Rolf said, TRUE & FALSE is FALSE but TRUE & TRUE is TRUE, so TRUE & NA could be either TRUE or FALSE and consequently is NA. OTOH FALSE & (anything) is FALSE so FALSE & NA is FALSE. According to this logic why is FALSE & NA [1] FALSE
Huh???? cheers, Rolf Turner -- Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
