> On Oct 10, 2017, at 9:09 AM, davide cortellino <davidecortell...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Dear All > > > I have run the following GLM binominal model on a dataset composed by the > following variables: > > TRAN_DURING_CAMP_FLG enviados bono_recibido > 0 1 benchmark > 0 1 benchmark > 0 1 benchmark > 0 1 benchmark > 0 1 benchmark > 0 1 benchmark > > > - tran_during_flag= redemption yes/no (1/0) > - enviados= counter variables, all 1's > - bono_recibido= benchmark(control group) or test groups (two type of > test groups) > > The model used has been > > glm(TRAN_DURING_CAMP_FLG~bono_recibido,exp2,family="binomial") > > Estimate Std. Error z value > Pr(>|z|)(Intercept) -1.4924117 0.01372190 -108.761315 > 0.000000e+00 > bono_recibidoBONO3EUROS -0.8727739 0.09931119 -8.788274 1.518758e-18 > bono_recibidoBONO6EUROS 0.1069435 0.02043840 5.232480 1.672507e-07 > > The scope for this model was to test if there was significative difference > in the redemption rate between control group and test groups. Now, applying > the post hoc test: > >> Treat.comp<-glht(mod.binposthoc,mcp(bono_recibido='Tukey'))> >> summary(Treat.comp) # el modelo se encuentra en log odds aqui > > Simultaneous Tests for General Linear Hypotheses > Multiple Comparisons of Means: Tukey Contrasts > > Fit: glm(formula = TRAN_DURING_CAMP_FLG ~ bono_recibido, family = "binomial", > data = exp2) > Linear Hypotheses: > Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) > BONO3EUROS - benchmark == 0 -0.87277 0.09931 -8.788 < 1e-09 *** > BONO6EUROS - benchmark == 0 0.10694 0.02044 5.232 3.34e-07 *** > BONO6EUROS - BONO3EUROS == 0 0.97972 0.09952 9.845 < 1e-09 > ***---Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ > 1(Adjusted p values reported -- single-step method) > > It confirm that the differences are significatively differents, however, I > would check the power of the model in assessing these differences. I have > checked several time both on cross validates and on the web but it seems > there is no pre-made function which enable the user to compute the power of > glm models. Is it the case? Does anyone know of available packages or > methodologies to achive a power test in a glm binominal model?
What's the point? The time to do power tests is before the experiment is performed. There's really no value in doing post hoc power testing, and this is especially true when you have highly significant results. > Bests > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA 'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.' -Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
