Hi
Sorry, I think this has always been the behaviour (and the documentation
has always been wrong).
Using locator() yourself could be a workaround (with a little more
effort required to determine the closest data point).
Paul
On 16/02/18 09:32, Samuel GRANJEAUD IR/INSERM wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your answer. I am wondering if in the previous versions,
let's say 2.1x, the data were in the selection order... Let me know if
there a R fonction taht I can code. Do you think I should use locator
function and match points on my own?
Best,
Samuel
--
Dr Paul Murrell
Department of Statistics
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland
New Zealand
64 9 3737599 x85392
p...@stat.auckland.ac.nz
http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
