What might be the likely outcomes of an attempt to reinstall 3.6.1?
And might that depend on whether the current 3.6.1 was
uninstalled first?
Spencer
On 2019-07-17 07:17, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
It would never make sense for such messages to reflect normal and
expected operation, so hypothesizing about intentionally changing
stack behavior doesn't make sense.
The default format for saveRDS changed in 3.6.0. There may be bugs
associated with that, but rolling back to 3.6.0 would just trade bugs.
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html
On July 16, 2019 8:56:28 PM CDT, Jan Galkowski
<bayesianlogi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Did something seriously change in R 3.6.1 at least for Windows in terms
of stack impacts?
I'm encountering many problems with the 00UNLOCK, needing to disable
locking during installations.
And I'm encountering
Error: C stack usage 63737888 is too close to the limit
for cases I did not before, even when all I'm doing is serializing an
object to be saved with *saveRDS* or even *save.image(.)*.
Yes, I know, I did not append a minimally complete example. Just wanted
to see if it was just me, or if anyone else was seeing this.
It's on Windows 7 HE and I've run *R* here for years.
My inclination is to drop back to 3.6.0 if it is just me or if no one
knows about this problem.
Thanks,
- Jan Galkowski.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
