Hi Abby, I don’t really understand why you’re upset with me, but a) they’re cultured cell lines, not animals, b) they might cure people, c) I don’t do experiments, d) modern slavery, dated today: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/21/such-brutality-tricked-into-slavery-in-the-thai-fishing-industry .
I simply don’t like the word, and it doesn’t even describe what the option does. Best, Ben > On 22 Sep 2019, at 00:56, Abby Spurdle <spurdl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (excerpts only) >> slavery being easily justified by the Bible while abolition is not is an >> experience. >> P.S. Do any R developers actually read this? > > I've read one or two verses... > > I also found this (by you): > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20362542 > > Which uses embryonic stem cells. > I recognize that they're mouse embryos. > However, your article cites at least five other articles (probably, a > lot more), that use human embryonic stem cells. > > You complain about slavery (that doesn't exist), and then prompte > murder (which does exist). > What does that say about you... > > And that's ignoring the way you treat animals > We slice and dice data, you slice and dice living creatures. > > Here's two songs about freedom, if you have ears to hear: > https://youtu.be/lKw6uqtGFfo > https://youtu.be/HAIdo707Sac [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
