> It is not clear what multiway left join means but merge.zoo (though
> not merge.xts) supports a generalized all= argument which is a logical
> vector having the same length as L that can be TRUE or FALSE for each
> object merged.  The objects corresponding to TRUE will have all their
> times included in the result but the ones with FALSE will only be
> included if they correspond to an already existing time. merge.zoo is
> R based whereas merge.xts is C based so I would not expect it to be as
> fast although it is more powerful.
>
> If All is the logical vector having the same length as L then:
>
>     Lzoo <- lapply(L, as.zoo)
>     do.call("merge",  c(Lzoo, list(all = All))
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:31 AM Eric Berger <ericjber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Gabor,
> > This is great, thanks. It brought the time down to about 4 seconds.
> > The command
> > do.call("merge.xts",L)
> > also works in this case.
> > Suppose that instead of the default "outer" join I wanted to use, say, a 
> > "left" join.
> > Is that possible? I tried a few ways of adding the
> > join="left"
> > parameter to the do.call() command but I could not get the syntax to work 
> > (assuming it's even possible).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:23 PM Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendi...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> You don't need Reduce as xts already supports mutliway merges.  This
> >> perfroms one
> >> multiway merge rather than  k-1 two way merges.
> >>
> >>     do.call("merge", L)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:13 AM Eric Berger <ericjber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I have a list L of about 2,600 xts's.
> >> > Each xts has a single numeric column. About 90% of the xts's have
> >> > approximately 500 rows, and the rest have fewer than 500 rows.
> >> > I create a single xts using the command
> >> >
> >> > myXts <- Reduce( merge.xts, L )
> >> >
> >> > By default, merge.xts() does an outer join (which is what I want).
> >> >
> >> > The command takes about 80 seconds to complete.
> >> > I have plenty of RAM on my computer.
> >> >
> >> > Are there faster ways to accomplish this task?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Eric
> >> >
> >> >         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >> >
> >> > ______________________________________________
> >> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> >> > PLEASE do read the posting guide 
> >> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Statistics & Software Consulting
> >> GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
> >> tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
> >> email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com
>
>
>
> --
> Statistics & Software Consulting
> GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
> tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
> email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com



-- 
Statistics & Software Consulting
GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to