Dear All,
I am wondering whether function arguments autocomplete causes a bug when
additional ellipsis arguments are used.
Example:
a = function(robot) {
cat(robot, "\n")
}
a(r=5) prints 5, meaning that r is autocompleted to “robot”. Not sure if this
is normal behavior, but this does not cause problems.
This would be fine, but somehow causes problems when there is an additional
ellipsis argument that can be used to autocomplete an already existing
argument. In the example below, when we are calling sens.analysis.all,
everything starting with q is an additional argument (…). Now, k is missed
completely. And that is because there is another actual argument that starts
with k — key.legend.axes (it is assigned to 4 instead). If “k=4” is changed to
“kk=4” the problem disappears.
sens.analysis.all <- function(func, outgrid, parvec, parmin, parmax,
length.pgrid, outvname, zlim, plabs,
gridlab, mylog, outlog=FALSE, ytick=NULL,
xline=NULL, yline=NULL, mypal=topo.colors,
key.legend.axes=NULL, plot.guidance=FALSE, ... ) {
cat(..1, "\n")
cat(..2, "\n")
cat(..3, "\n")
out=1
out
}
out = sens.analysis.all(numer.wait.times.wrps, NA,
c(5.4, 0.008, 1.5), c(4.9, 0.0079, 2.0), c(5.5, 0.0090, 3.5),
length.pgrid=10, outvname="cvs", zlim=c(0.3, 2),
plabs=c("mu", "lambda", "b"), gridlab="Soil Moisture [mm]",
mylog=FALSE, outlog=FALSE, yline=2, plot.guidance=FALSE, q=3.1, k=4,
y.c=670,
realgrid=seq(630, 670, by=4), myseed=0,
nt=1000000, burnin=300000, bin.cutoff=500,
bdW.prelim=prec.struct.Mal)
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
