On 02/09/2021 3:20 p.m., Greg Minshall wrote:
Andrew,
x[] <- lapply(x, function(xx) {
xx[is.nan(xx)] <- NA_real_
xx
})
is different from
x <- lapply(x, function(xx) {
xx[is.nan(xx)] <- NA_real_
xx
})
indeed, the two are different -- but some ignorance of mine is exposed.
i wonder, can you explain why the two are different?
x <- lapply(...) says "set x to the list on the RHS", so x becomes a
list, not a dataframe.
x[] <- lapply(...) says "set the values in x to the values in the list
on the RHS", so x retains its class.
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.