I don't find _either_ of these acceptable.
On the other hand,
x[ is.na( x ) ] <- 1
should have no effect on x.
On December 16, 2022 10:28:52 AM PST, "Göran Broström" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I'm confused:
>
>> x <- 1:2
>> is.na(x) <- 1
>> x
>[1] NA 2
>
>OK, but
>
>> x <- c("A", "B")
>> is.na(x) <- "A"
>> x
> A
>"A" "B" NA
>
>What happens?
>
>G_ran
>
>______________________________________________
>[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
