В Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:13:59 +0200 Troels Ring <tr...@gvdnet.dk> пишет:
> Now e looks right - but I have been unable to find out how to get the > string e converted to the proper argument for sum() - i.e. what is > function xx? get(e) will return the value of the variable with the name stored in the variable e. A more idiomatic variant will require more changes: 1. Create the "adds" variable as a list, so that it could contain other arbitrary R values: adds <- list() 2. Instead of assigning adds1 <- something(), adds2 <- something_else(), ..., assign to the elements of the list: adds[[1]] <- something() adds[[2]] <- something_else() ... 3. Now you can use the same syntax to access the elements of the list: SS[i] <- sum(adds[[i]]) As a bonus, you can use the "apply" family of R functions that will perform the loop for you: instead of SS <- c(); for (i in 1:11) SS[i] <- sum(adds[[i]]) you can write SS <- vapply(adds, sum, numeric(1)) ...and it will perform the same loop inside it, verifying each time that sum(adds[[i]]) returns a single number. -- Best regards, Ivan P.S. I'm sorry for letting our project lapse. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
