There are issues with chatbots in terms of what they allow and how they were 
trained. Kind of like walking into a mine field.
That said chatbots are useful tools. You can muddy the waters by writing your 
own code but have the chatbot help you with specific sub-tasks that you then 
assemble into a working program.
Always check the chatbot "answer." Chatbots often assume things or don't assume 
things thereby being very certain that their wrong answer is what you want. You 
can easily spend as much time correcting the chatbot as you would writing the 
program yourself. That said, the chatbot can provide an answer that works but 
is not how you would have written the program.

On many occasions I have had the chatbot state "Here is the fully functional 
code ..." only to find that it does not run at all.
Chatbots lie but do so with conviction!

-----Original Message-----
From: R-help <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert Knight
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 10:40 AM
To: Gregg Powell <[email protected]>
Cc: R help project <[email protected]>; Hans W <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [R] Chatbot -generated R Code

[External Email]

It seems like malpractice to recommend Claude to someone using R or big data 
since what they would use it for is *explicitly* against the terms of service.  
Machine learning predates the microchip.

See below.

Also, quality control will make a comeback.  Expert systems cannot be replaced 
with something akin to Bayes probability charts indedinitely.

you may not use the service to "develop any products or services that compete 
with our Services, including to develop or train any artificial intelligence or 
machine learning algorithms or models."

Claude's terms further state

"*Equitable relief.* You agree that (a) no adequate remedy exists at law if you 
breach Section 3 (Use of Our Services); (b) it would be difficult to determine 
the damages resulting from such breach, and any such breach would cause 
irreparable harm; and (c) a grant of injunctive relief provides the best remedy 
for any such breach. You waive any opposition to such injunctive relief, as 
well as any demand that we prove actual damage or post a bond or other security 
in connection with such injunctive relief."

Machine learning includes linear regression. Other Machine Learning algorithms 
include Logistic Regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector 
machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, & Bayes Algorithms. It seems to me, that as of 
14 October 2024, no one seeking to handle any data science can legitimately use 
Claude


On Tuesday, December 9, 2025, Gregg Powell via R-help <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Humans who don't adapt to LLMs, or whatever form AI takes as it
> evolves, will be left in the dust.
>
> People may just now be waking up to the fact that we're three years
> into a tremendous revolution, one of the greatest in human history. It
> follows the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the Industrial Revolution, the
> computer revolution, the Information Age, and now... AI.
>
> AGI is approaching. How quickly? Who can say. Whether AI can ever be
> truly sentient remains a mystery. But once it can adequately replicate
> sentience, some will ask: what's the difference?
>
> As to the question of who judges what's acceptable from a coding
> standpoint: capitalism will. Corporations will. And the question of
> whether this is the future of coding is already behind us. It is
> coding now, and it will only continue to improve in capability.
>
> Try Replit, Cursor, Claude Code. Humans are incapable of keeping up.
> AI still struggles with some of the most complex tasks, and it does
> poorly at orchestrating across large repositories, but it's improving rapidly.
> Just my observations.
>
>
> Those who look down their noses at all this will be left behind.
>
> All the best!
> Gregg
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 9th, 2025 at 6:32 AM, Hans W
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > SORRY if I missed such a discussion somewhere on R-HELP
> >
>
> > For many years I wanted to write an R function that finds the
> > closest
> pair of
> > points among a, maybe huge, set of points on the 2-dimensional
> > plane. I
> never
> > did, perhaps considering the possible complexity of this task.
> >
>
> > Now I found a book, among others describing the "sweeping
> > algorithm",
> perfectly
> > suited for the problem. And as a test, I questioned chatbots like
> DeepSeek and
> > ChatGPT about such a function - and mentioned the sweeping algorithm.
> >
>
> > DeepSeek, for instance, came immediately up with a complete,
> > efficient
> solution
> > and test cases that I checked with brute force. I can see that it
> utilized the
> > sweeping algorithm, documented the code, and set up a help file. I
> > made
> some
> > changes, improved the code a bit, but still it is code generated by
> > a
> clever
> > chatbot, whatever I do.
> >
>
> > Now I ask myself: Is this a correct and lawful way to write code in
> > the
> future?
> > I am not even sure DeepSeek may not have used an implementation of
> > the
> sweeping
> > algorithm that is under ACM license and would not be allowed on CRAN.
> >
>
> > I wonder how one handles this matter? Will this be the future of
> > code
> writing
> > (for R and other languages)? I would really appreciate to hear your
> opinion or
> > a hint to a discussion about it.
> >
>
> > Hans Werner
> >
>
> > ______________________________________________
> > [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://st/
> > at.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C02%7Ctebert%40ufl
> > .edu%7C37900d094b87485ee44c08de3739481c%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a6233
> > 1e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C639008916320512560%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0
> > eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIs
> > IldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=uXnwpZweyo3sH3Ndy4naUWah6oVLnhsZ
> > XtgYqe3MNpU%3D&reserved=0 PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > https://ww/
> > w.r-project.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C37900d094b87485
> > ee44c08de3739481c%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C63900
> > 8916320573022%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOi
> > IwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7
> > C%7C%7C&sdata=uGcdPPvvIumkXqRx1DjECWvS09Oh4b7URAk7BWETbfs%3D&reserve
> > d=0
> posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide https://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to