On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11/11/2008 2:56 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
Ummm... as today is still Armistice day (in my time zone, anyway), maybe
we
should call a truce and end this flame war...
I haven't seen very many flames -- there have been disagreements, but
generally it's been quite civil. Certainly I don't think Berwin flamed me.
If we were to add in a warning about partial name matching, it would have to
be accompanied by some way to deal with common uses like the one Berwin
mentioned. (There are at least 100 uses of seq(..., length=...) in the core
& recommended packages. I wouldn't want to fix all of those.) But it could
still be useful, in the same way the checks for using TRUE and FALSE instead
of T and F are useful.
Actually we do already have such a check: see ?options (the warnPartial*
options). And when I checked a while back did discover and correct a lot
of partial matches, about half a dozen or so of which were matching to the
wrong thing. From the NEWS for 2.6.0:
o New options 'warnPartialMatchDollar', 'warnPartialMatchArgs'
and 'warnPartialMatchAttr' to help detect the unintended use
of partial matching in $, argument matching and attr()
respectively.
I did at that time check if it were possible to change the arg names in
seq(), but that horse has bolted since there are methods in public
packages using the existing arg sequence.
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
