Please provide the input file so its reproducible. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:12 PM, stephen sefick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These are the two functions that I use to read the data in. I have > reverted back to R 2.7.2, chron 2.3-24, zoo 1.5-4, StreamMetabolism > 0.03. This configuration works just fine- like I expect and with > considerable time speed up over both R 2.8 and chron 2.3-24 and > 2.3-25. > > fmt.chron <- function (x) > { > chron(sub(" .*", "", x), gsub(".* (.*)", "\\1:00", x)) > } > > read.production <- function (data) > { > read.zoo(data, sep = ",", FUN = fmt.chron, header = TRUE) > } > > > DateTime RM215Temp > 800 1/9/06 7:46 11.12 > 801 1/9/06 8:01 11.11 > 802 1/9/06 8:16 10.98 > 803 1/9/06 8:31 10.90 > 804 1/9/06 8:46 10.94 > 805 1/9/06 9:01 10.98 > 806 1/9/06 9:16 10.98 > 807 1/9/06 9:31 11.00 > 808 1/9/06 9:46 11.02 > 809 1/9/06 10:01 11.04 > 810 1/9/06 10:16 11.06 > 811 1/9/06 10:31 11.07 > 812 1/9/06 10:46 11.09 > 813 1/9/06 11:01 11.11 > 814 1/9/06 11:16 11.13 > 815 1/9/06 11:31 11.16 > 816 1/9/06 11:46 11.18 > 817 1/9/06 12:01 11.20 > 818 1/9/06 12:16 11.23 > 819 1/9/06 12:31 11.27 > 820 1/9/06 12:46 11.30 > 821 1/9/06 13:01 11.33 > 822 1/9/06 13:16 11.36 > 823 1/9/06 13:31 11.39 > 824 1/9/06 13:46 11.42 > 825 1/9/06 14:01 11.44 > 826 1/9/06 14:16 11.45 > 827 1/9/06 14:31 11.48 > 828 1/9/06 14:46 11.50 > 829 1/9/06 15:01 11.52 > 830 1/9/06 15:16 11.54 > 831 1/9/06 15:31 11.56 > 832 1/9/06 15:46 11.59 > 833 1/9/06 16:01 11.61 > 834 1/9/06 16:16 11.64 > 835 1/9/06 16:31 11.64 > 836 1/9/06 16:46 11.64 > 837 1/9/06 17:01 11.62 > 838 1/9/06 17:16 11.60 > 839 1/9/06 17:31 11.58 > 840 1/9/06 17:46 11.57 > 841 1/9/06 18:01 11.60 > 842 1/9/06 18:16 11.57 > 843 1/9/06 18:31 11.45 > 844 1/9/06 18:46 11.40 > 845 1/9/06 19:01 11.44 > 846 1/9/06 19:16 11.38 > 847 1/9/06 19:31 11.39 > 848 1/9/06 19:46 11.43 > 849 1/9/06 20:01 11.40 > 850 1/9/06 20:16 11.44 > 851 1/9/06 20:31 11.24 > 852 1/9/06 20:46 11.08 > 853 1/9/06 21:01 11.10 > 854 1/9/06 21:16 11.08 > 855 1/9/06 21:31 11.08 > 856 1/9/06 21:46 11.08 > 857 1/9/06 22:01 11.07 > 858 1/9/06 22:16 11.07 > 859 1/9/06 22:31 11.08 > 860 1/9/06 22:46 11.08 > 861 1/9/06 23:01 11.07 > 862 1/9/06 23:16 11.07 > 863 1/9/06 23:31 11.06 > 864 1/9/06 23:46 11.06 > 865 1/10/06 0:01 11.05 > 866 1/10/06 0:16 11.05 > 867 1/10/06 0:31 11.05 > 868 1/10/06 0:46 11.04 > 869 1/10/06 1:01 11.04 > 870 1/10/06 1:16 11.03 > 871 1/10/06 1:31 11.03 > 872 1/10/06 1:46 11.02 > 873 1/10/06 2:01 11.02 > 874 1/10/06 2:16 11.01 > 875 1/10/06 2:31 11.01 > 876 1/10/06 2:46 11.01 > 877 1/10/06 3:01 11.00 > 878 1/10/06 3:16 10.99 > 879 1/10/06 3:31 10.99 > 880 1/10/06 3:46 10.99 > 881 1/10/06 4:01 10.98 > 882 1/10/06 4:16 10.97 > 883 1/10/06 4:31 10.97 > 884 1/10/06 4:46 10.96 > 885 1/10/06 5:01 10.95 > 886 1/10/06 5:16 10.95 > 887 1/10/06 5:31 10.94 > 888 1/10/06 5:46 10.93 > 889 1/10/06 6:01 10.93 > 890 1/10/06 6:16 10.93 > 891 1/10/06 6:31 10.94 > 892 1/10/06 6:46 10.93 > 893 1/10/06 7:01 10.90 > 894 1/10/06 7:16 10.90 > 895 1/10/06 7:31 10.91 > 896 1/10/06 7:46 10.92 > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Gabor Grothendieck > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The key thing to do is to provide some reproducible code that >> someone else can use to verify the problem even if you have >> to use it on 2.7.2 with the old chron and 2.8.0 with the new chron. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM, stephen sefick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I have built chron 2.3-24 under 2.8 and it is acting the same as >>> 2.3-24 and as to the previous email the zoo version is the same for >>> both. My next test will be to get 2.7.2 up and running again, and see >>> what the behavior is under this version with the different versions of >>> chron. I have not figured out how to install || versions of R in mac >>> OS X it looks like the packages are maintained but the application is >>> automatically removed and updated into the current version. What else >>> should I try? >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Gabor Grothendieck >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Two things to try: >>>> >>>> - try running both under 2.7.2 instead of trying both under 2.8 >>>> - if you know how to build packages from source then try rebuilding the >>>> chron you have under 2.7.2 using 2.98. You can find it here: >>>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/chron/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, stephen sefick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> I found the library where all of the older packages are located. >>>>> >>>>> library(chron, lib = >>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library") >>>>> >>>>> Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : >>>>> unable to load shared library >>>>> '/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library/chron/libs/i386/chron.so': >>>>> >>>>> dlopen(/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library/chron/libs/i386/chron.so, >>>>> 6): Library not loaded: >>>>> /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libR.dylib >>>>> Referenced from: >>>>> /Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library/chron/libs/i386/chron.so >>>>> Reason: image not found >>>>> Error: package/namespace load failed for 'chron' >>>>> >>>>> The code above works with zoo >>>>> library(zoo, lib = >>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library") >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Gabor Grothendieck >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> To run the old version of chron that you have under 2.7.2 >>>>>> into 2.8.0, on 2.7.2 issue the command (note initial dot): >>>>>> >>>>>> .libPaths() >>>>>> >>>>>> Suppose you find that the library that contains chron in >>>>>> 2.7.2 is "/a/b". >>>>>> >>>>>> Then on 2.8.0 ensure that you don't have chron on the search path >>>>>> >>>>>> search() >>>>>> >>>>>> and if you do detach it: >>>>>> >>>>>> detach("package:chron") >>>>>> search() # should no longer be there >>>>>> >>>>>> Then run this where "..." is the library that the old version of chron >>>>>> is in under 2.7.2. >>>>>> >>>>>> library(chron, lib = "...") >>>>>> >>>>>> To run the new version of chron detach the old version and just use: >>>>>> >>>>>> library(chron) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:14 PM, stephen sefick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Yes >>>>>>> chron 2.3-25 >>>>>>> zoo 1.5-4 >>>>>>> R 2.8 >>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.5.5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gabor I don't know how to start up another verison of R on the mac. I >>>>>>> will figure this out, and get back to you (I can then test both of >>>>>>> them side by side). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> other fast installation (version numbers from description files in R >>>>>>> 2.7.2 directory) >>>>>>> chron 2.3-24 >>>>>>> zoo 1.5-4 >>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.5.5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stephen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Gabor Grothendieck >>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Are you using the same version of chron both times? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:05 AM, stephen sefick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> has anyone had problems with the upgrade to R 2.8 and chron date >>>>>>>>> classes. I have a large zoo object that has a chron index, and it is >>>>>>>>> taking 5x or so longer to do the same calculation as with 2.7 if it >>>>>>>>> doesn't fail. I will provide anything necessary I am not entirely >>>>>>>>> sure what ya'll would need if anything to try and reproduce the >>>>>>>>> behavior. I am using the package StreamMetabolism. >>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Stephen Sefick >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are >>>>>>>>> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and >>>>>>>>> make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the >>>>>>>>> annoying little problems of being mammals. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -K. >>>>>>>>> Mullis >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list >>>>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >>>>>>>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide >>>>>>>>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >>>>>>>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Stephen Sefick >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are >>>>>>> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and >>>>>>> make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the >>>>>>> annoying little problems of being mammals. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -K. >>>>>>> Mullis >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Stephen Sefick >>>>> >>>>> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are >>>>> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and >>>>> make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the >>>>> annoying little problems of being mammals. >>>>> >>>>> -K. Mullis >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Stephen Sefick >>> >>> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are >>> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and >>> make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the >>> annoying little problems of being mammals. >>> >>> -K. Mullis >>> >> > > > > -- > Stephen Sefick > > Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are > so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and > make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the > annoying little problems of being mammals. > > -K. Mullis >
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.