On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:00:28AM -0600, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote: > This is great to see. It's interesting that SAS Institute feels that > non-peer-reviewed software with hidden implementations of analytic > methods that cannot be reproduced by others should be trusted when > building aircraft engines. > > Frank
Unfortunately, that type of FUD issued by the SAS marketing person still works. I see it at my employer (a large healthcare company.) It's a battle to change a culture, but ironically the recession helps. People are now taking notice of the obscene licensing fees for SAS. Darin ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.