'The R Inferno' page 36.
Patrick Burns
patr...@burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of "The R Inferno" and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")
SnowManPaddington wrote:
Hi ya, thanks a lot everyone!! I changed rr:ii-1 to rr:(ii-1) and the code
works!!! I finally get some estimates from the optimization function (i am
doing a logit model with 2 segments). Thanks thanks!!!
I didn't realize rr:(ii-1) and rr:ii-1 would make such a big difference,
especially because the professor used rr:ii-1 in his Gauss code. I didn't
realize it means so much different in R!
davidr-2 wrote:
The lines below made me understand clearly. Maybe they are already in
some documentation,
but if not, it might help others to avoid my misunderstanding.
Thanks to all for the clarifications.
-- David
-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murd...@stats.uwo.ca]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:54 AM
To: David Reiner <dav...@rhotrading.com>
Cc: Henrik Bengtsson; r-help@r-project.org; SnowManPaddington
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [R] scoping rules for 'for' [was - Re: for/if loop
] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body
<snip>
Feel free to do what you like to the variable within the
loop (though you might cause Luke to grind his teeth when it messes up
his compiler). It will be set to the next value in the 1:10 vector the
next time it comes back to the top.
<snip>
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
