hadley wrote:
>
>> Am I doing something wrong, here? If not, which are the real AIC and
>> logLik
>> values for the different models?
>
>
The difference here is that summary() is using REML=TRUE and anova()
is using REML=FALSE. It makes sense that anova (which is typically being
used to compare fixed effects) should make this assumption, but I'm not
sure whether it's documented anywhere.
Ben Bolker
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AICs-from-lmer-different-with-summary-and-anova-tp23061269p23125352.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
