I'd be happy if everyone made a minimal effort to solve their problems before posting. There may be 130 pages of printed FAQs, but the html file is fully searchable. It would be easier to browse with a good ToC, but it's not that overwhelming to _look to see if there's a FAQ related to your problem_.
I think pointing people to Rseek is probably more useful than sending them directly to the FAQs. Sarah On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:25 PM, hadley wickham <h.wick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "Have you read the posting guide and the FAQs? If you do not get a reply >> within two days, you may want to look at both and think about reformulating >> your query. Oh, and while you are at it, look through the archives, a lot of >> questions have already been asked and answered before." > > As I say every time someone brings this up, there are currently ~130 > printed pages of FAQs. Reading all that seems a rather large burden > on the novice poster. > > Hadley > > -- > http://had.co.nz/ > -- Sarah Goslee http://www.functionaldiversity.org ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
