Hi,
Maybe I know the answer to my own question.
When I built R 2.9.0, I didn't say:
./configure --enable-R-shlib
I know I have given "--prefix" flag, but that's
the only flag I used.
I would appreciate it, if someone would give me
a definitive answer, however.
Regards,
Tena Sakai
tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org on behalf of Tena Sakai
Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 4:07 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] I don't see libR.so in my installation directory
Hi,
I installed R 2.9.0 a couple of days ago on a
linux machine. At the root of installation,
I see 4 directories: bin, lib64, share, and src.
I don't see libR.so anywhere. (In the following
context, . (dot) indicates the root of my insta-
llation.) I do see:
./lib64/R/lib/libRblas.so
./lib64/R/lib/libRlapack.so
I became aware of such as I was preparing for
an installation of little r. The installation
material stated to look for libR.so, and I want
to make sure that the one I installed (2.9.0)
is used by little r.
Would someone please clue me in? Why don't I
have libR.so and yet when I execute ./bin/R
it says:
R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
Regards,
Tena Sakai
tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
