A table without names displays like a vector: > unname(table(2:3)) [1] 1 1 1
and preserves the table class (as with unname in general): > dput(unname(table(2:3))) structure(c(1L, 1L), .Dim = 2L, class = "table") Does that make sense? R is not consistent in its treatment of such unname'd tables: In plot, they are considered erroneous input: > plot(unname(table(2:3))) Error in xy.coords(x, y, xlabel, ylabel, log) : 'x' and 'y' lengths differ but in melt, they act as though they have names 1:n: > melt(unname(table(2:3))) indicies value 1 1 1 2 2 1 (By the way, is the spelling error built into too much code to be corrected?) -s PS What is the standard way of extracting just the underlying vector? c(unname(...)) works -- is that what is recommended? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.