On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Martin Maechler<maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> "TobiasV" == Tobias Verbeke <tobias.verb...@openanalytics.be> >>>>>> on Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:25:07 +0200 writes: > > TobiasV> Hi Ken, > >> I have been using R for a while. Recently, I have begun converting my > >> package into S4 classes. I was previously using Rdoc for documentation. > >> Now, I am looking to use the best tool for S4 documentation. It seems > that > >> the best choices for me are Roxygen and Sweave (I am fine with tex). > >> > >> Are there any users of Roxygen or Sweave who can comment on the > strengths or > >> weaknesses of one or othe other? Thanks in advance. > > TobiasV> For the moment proper documentation of S4 classes (with a @slot > tag > TobiasV> e.g.) is not implemented yet, > > how did you define "proper" here? > > I know that the result of promptClass() may not always be > perfect. As most things are not perfect, > I would not quickly call this improper ... > > Or is using *.Rd not proper for you, > as it does not have all of code + docs in one file?
I think Tobias was referring to Roxygen support for S4 classes, not the existence of .Rd tags. > > Regards, > Martin > > TobiasV> but my secret hope is that this will > TobiasV> be implemented before Peter and Manuel (in cc) will present > Roxygen > TobiasV> at DSC2009. Maybe they have further comments ? > > TobiasV> Kind regards, > TobiasV> Tobias > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
