On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murd...@stats.uwo.ca> wrote: > Gabor Grothendieck wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murd...@stats.uwo.ca> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 10/23/2009 2:49 PM, Andrew Yee wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks everyone for the responses. As a suggestion, wouldn't it be >>>> useful, >>>> that when you run isdebugged() without any parameters, it would just >>>> report >>>> back the functions that are being flagged for debugging? >>>> >>> >>> Could you give an example of what the answer would look like? Not all >>> functions have names, not all names are unique, ... >>> >>> >> >> One could use the formal argument list of the function, i.e. the >> output of args, when there is no notion of name since that is always >> available. >> > > It would actually be easier to return a copy of the whole function. But
That`s already done when you enter debugging and I find it quite annoying particularly when you have large functions interrupting the flow. I wish there were some way to limit this. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
