amor Gandhi wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to use SAMr-library(samr), it gives me p-value = 1.001, any idea
why?
Well, the package maintainer might be a better place to ask. (Bring an
example if you do.)
However, as a generic matter, the result is obviously nonsensical, and
could be due to a sloppy approximation of a distribution function, or
maybe it is a (say) Bonferroni-adjusted p-value which is really an upper
bound for the correct p-value.
Notice, though, that you should only very rarely care about the exact
p-value. As soon as it is above 0.1, the message is just that you have
not proven that there is an effect.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalga...@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
