Hello,
I am not too sure if anyone tried this out. but I ma fitting a mixture model
via the EM algorithmn.
But then I tried using CAMAN package and I seem to get different results.
Has anyone else had this problem? For example, I am fitting the Inness data
from the text Medical Applications of Finite Mixture Models but, my aswer
from my algorithmn is:
Lamda1 1.728469
Lambda2 8.892720
p1 0.580639
p2 0.419361
but CAMAN gives the following results:
Lamda1 1.822729
Lambda2 9.235688
p1 0.6457857
p2 0.3542143
Even the loglikelihoods I am working out is a little different from the ones
supplied by CAMAN.
Thanks,
Jim
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
