Hello,

I was doing a linear regression with the following formula:
*lm(y~x+0)*, so it passes through the origin. But when I called the summary
of the regression i saw that R squared is abnormally high (it's a lot lower
in other programs such as SigmaPlot and MS Excel).The manual explained the
cause of the difference (because of the different computing method), but
what should I do to get the same R^2 in excel and R?

WITHOUT PASSING THROUGH THE ORIGIN:
R^2: Multiple R-squared: 0.9711,     Adjusted R-squared: 0.9654
In MS Excel: 0,9711

*So it's OK.*


WITH PASSING THROUGH THE ORIGIN:
Multiple R-squared: 0.9848,     Adjusted R-squared: 0.9822
In MS Excel: 0,8907

*So almost 10% difference.*

Thank you for your help.

Csanad Bertok, Hungary

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to