Agreed. The tables in the pdf the poster at http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-01/msg00098.html links to look terrible compared to the standard I am used to from Hmisc::latex(). Just saying.
-Ista On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Frank E Harrell Jr <f.harr...@vanderbilt.edu> wrote: > Cody, > > How amazing that SAS is still used to produce reports that reviewers hate > and that requires tedious low-level programming. R + LaTeX has it all over > that approach IMHO. We have used that combination very successfully for > several data and safety monitoring reporting tasks for clinical trials for > the pharmaceutical industry. > > Frank > > > Cody Hamilton wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> There have been a variety of discussions on the R list regarding the use >> of R in clinical trials. The following post from the STATA list provides an >> interesting opinion regarding why SAS remains so popular in this arena: >> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-01/msg00098.html >> >> Regards, >> >> -Cody Hamilton > > -- > Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chairman School of Medicine > Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Ista Zahn Graduate student University of Rochester Department of Clinical and Social Psychology http://yourpsyche.org ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.