Patrick Burns wrote:
> 
> * What were your biggest misconceptions or
> stumbling blocks to getting up and running
> with R?
> 
> 
(This derives partly from teaching)

The fact that this xapply-stuff was not idempotent (worse: not always) and
that you need a monster like do.call() to straighten this out. Nowadays,
plyr comes close.

The concept of environment. With S it was worse, though.

That you cannot change values "passed by reference". I noted that the latter
is no problem for students who have not worked with c(++/#) before. That
there is only one return-result in functions.

"[" and the likes as an operator.

10 years ago, when I started, the message was: S4 is the future, S3 is
legacy. So I learned S4. Only to never use is in self-written code later.
Might be different for BioConductor people.

That sometimes you can use vectors not in data= (lattice), and sometimes not
(ggplot2). Still a VERY confusing inconsistency.

The "why-does-this-not-print" FAQ.

Why does par(oma..) not work with lattice?

Dieter


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/two-questions-for-R-beginners-tp1569384p1570249.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to