These are generally very similar, for obvious reasons. But in the
analysis I have just done:
> pvals.fnc(Vcso.lmerC2trimmed, nsim=10000)$fixed
Estimate MCMCmean HPD95lower HPD95upper pMCMC
Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 6.5878 6.5870 6.5126 6.6591 0.0001
0.0000
cTrial -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0006 0.0002 0.4088
0.3996
lexword -0.0977 -0.0968 -0.1228 -0.0698 0.0001
0.0000
conditionpure 0.0892 0.0896 0.0022 0.1781 0.0482
0.1744
lexword:conditionpure -0.0563 -0.0569 -0.0853 -0.0287 0.0002
0.0001
there's a large discrepancy for the conditionpure row. I have not
been able to find examples of, or discussions of,
how to respond to such discrepancies; so any help would be much
appreciated.
Max Coltheart
> _____________________________________
> Professor Max Coltheart AM DSc FASSA FAA FBA
> Emeritus Professor of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University
> Honorary Professor of Psychology, University of Queensland
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
