>>> "John Fox" <j...@mcmaster.ca> 02/03/2010 02:19 >>>
>There's also a serious question about whether one would
>be interested in main effects defined as averages over the level of
the
>other factor when interactions are present.
My personal take on this particular chestnut is that I often want to
ask something about the relative size of the effects. If the so-called
"main effect(s)" is/are very much larger than the interactions, one may
be able to make generalisations which have practical use. If the effects
are much of a size, there's nothing much to be gained by asking about
"main effects".
Mind you, that's probably a crit of significance testing as the be-all
and end-all, rather than a problem with type I-III. Asking 'how big is
it?' is a step beyond 'is it there?'.
Steve E
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
