Yeah that's right; in that case implementing the print.myclass as you say would be the best option. Miguel
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Dieter Menne <dieter.me...@menne-biomed.de>wrote: > > > Miguel Porto wrote: > > > > Hmm... do something like that, no need to change the global option (I > used > > a > > named vector instead of a list, it's more convenient): > > > > eg <- function(x, digits=4) { > > xbar <- mean(x) > > sdx <- sd(x) > > value <- c(xbar, sdx) > > names(value) <- c("Mean of X", "SD of X") > > print(round(value,digits)); > > return(invisible(value))} > > > > > > Would be ok, but Josh explicitly had no print in the function, so one could > assume that he wanted full control. > > Dieter > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/Return-one-value-print-another-tp1590248p1590563.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.