Hi Jim,
Another thing I am wondering is - even if you have a metric for comparing
two images (which I admit I didn't come across and I don't know how to
approach), would that be enough to decide if two images are "close" or not?
My guess is that no - one would also need a database of other fingerprints,
to compare how much a particular image is closer to another image, compared
to how other images are close to that image.



Tal


----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com |  972-52-7275845
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Jim Lemon <j...@bitwrit.com.au> wrote:

> On 04/04/2010 05:18 AM, Juan Antonio Gil Pascual wrote:
>
>> Hi Bernado
>>
>> I need to compare two fingerprint images and let me know if you can do
>> with R. I have used the technique of minutiae but it seems to work
>> better with the cross-correlation and wanted to know if you can do with R.
>>
>>  Hi Juan,
> If you're using minutiae, you will want something like character
> recognition to identify the (admittedly arbitrary) elements of fingerprints
> like loops and whorls and their relative extents and positions. I don't know
> whether there is much character recognition stuff done in R, but it would
> certainly be related.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to