On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:55 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:51 PM, zhenjiang xu wrote: > >> I tried that. It seems the bar width is already maximized, although there >> is a lot of space between groups of bars. Thank you anyway. > > I apologize. It was reproducible code. I missed the "values" assignment. > There is also a box.width argument which does affect how the plot gets > drawn, but the effects do not appear salutory. It appears that the alignment > of the bars gets shifted relative to the labels. The barchart function > cannot seem to deal with the completity of the 2 * 5 factor crossed with a > c(3,3,4) factor. On the other hand that problem seems to be present in the > original plot as well. Maybe you should re-think the structure of the data?
The problem is that levels is nested within factors: > xtabs(~levels + factors, a) factors levels Cycles MaxPairs Order Cycle 1 10 0 0 Cycle 2 10 0 0 Cycle 3 10 0 0 Cycle 4 10 0 0 Order 1 0 0 10 Order 2 0 0 10 Order 3 0 0 10 MaxPairs = 20 0 10 0 MaxPairs = Average Length 0 10 0 MaxPairs = 500 0 10 0 I can't think of a meaningful design that would give the desired result here. -Deepayan ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.