On May 12, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Malter wrote:
Fair enough, my mistake. However, I am quite fascinated how that
focuses
everybody else on picking on the intitial answer and diverts
everybody away
from anwering the actual question. All the more it points to the
second
paragraph of my reply, namely that all modular components of the
function
should be checked.
For example:
lapply(data,function(){quantile(x,probs=0.25)})
#does not work, but
lapply(data,function(x){quantile(x,probs=0.25)})
#works
So perhaps missing out on the x in the definition of the function is
the
only problem. But for that, we would need the error message.
Or as the message says (over and over): "... reproducible code."
Maybe everyone that posts in html could be returned a mail-server
generated reply that has that text highlighted in blinking color.
Daniel
--
--
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
