On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Yao, Minghua wrote: > Thank you, Prof. Ripley. By adding na.action=na.exclude to loess function, > the program runs great. > > I did omit some trivial things. But I still think it was NA's that caused > troubles in predict or loess.
*NO* the errors message is from your usage of the result of predict(loess(Y~X)). Do make sure that you learn from your mistake, and you do need to understand why there is a difference here to do so. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
