Dear List,

I am trying to solve a problem by the neural network method(library:
nnet). The problem is to express Weight in terms of Age , Sex and
Height for twenty people(thius is an example given by Tanake in
"Introduction to Neural Networks by NEUROSIM/L"(2003, in Japanese))..
The data frame consists of 20 observations with four variables: Sex, Age,
Height and Weight. Sex is treated as a factor, Age and Weight are
variables normalized to unity, as usual. I wanted to construct a neural
network based on this data, and so I ran the following code:

>library(nnet)
>net1<-nnet(Weight~Age+Sex+Height, size=2, linout=T,maxit=1000)

I repeated this thirteen times.  I used the default initial parameters
unless otherwise noted. The result is as follows, where init and final
mean initial and final RSS's, and NIT means the number of iterations
before reaching convergence or noncovergence:

Run#    init            NIT     final
1       71991.1         30      995.1 
2       70870.0         370     33.1 
3       72755.8         <10     2134.3 
4       69840.6         <10     2134.3 
5       70368.8         190     39.7 
6       70368.8         270     41.0 
7       71101.2         190     39.7 
8       71606.1         <10     2134.3 
9       72076.1         <10     2134.3 
10      72249.1         300     15.0 
11      71424.1         <10     2134.3 
12      68483.8         130     39.7 
13      71435.9         >1000   4.6 


As you can see, the result is far from stable.

My question is:

How can I reach a stable answer?

.I know that initial parameters are crucially important in my case, and I
must choose proper parameter values, but I do not know how I can do that.

My second question is related to the response analysis of this data. I
do not know an effective method to evaluate the response to the
variance of each explanatory variable. Tanabe(2003) mentions "Net Effect
Ratio" defined by the average of dy/dx. Is there such a function in the
library, nnet? Such a function may help me reduce the number of the
explanatory variables.

I wonder if anyone could help me in such elementary questions.


---- It's elementary, Watson!

I remain an obedient Watson, hoping for Holmes' wisdom.


-- 
Yukihiro Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2-3-28 Tsurumaki-minami, Hadano
257-0002 Japan
Tel +81 463 69 1922
Fax +81 463 69 1922

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Reply via email to