>> I had noticed the remark on the help page, > > eehm, hardly possible, since I've only added it today to the > development sources... > You seem to be talking about something else, but related..
Indeed, I've been confusing myself thoroughly. I thought you were referring to the remark that is there at the moment in R 1.7.0. And I was confusing which.min and which.max too -- I was thinking of something like x <- c(3,4,1,1,2,8,5) which.max(x>2.5) which returns the first index where the condition is true. (This is a bad, though: it returns 1 when the condition is never true.) > Are you confusing which.min() and "min.which" (which does not exist)? > The non existing "min.which" is really the subject here, and > it's the one where match(a,x) can be used instead of > min(which(a == x)). Yes, I was confusing them -- via which.max. Sorry for confusing the issue! Damon. ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
