Replying to all also notifies everyone else that an answer has been provided to the questioner. I believe that replies to the originator do not go to the archives, which make it harder for someone else with essentially that question to get an answer from "search". The number of multiple responses could be reduced dramatically if this listserve did not have such a long delay. However, I presume the primary obstacle to that may be budget constraints at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ethz.ch). I'm happy to have the service, and I don't have the resources to help upgrade ETHZ's server, so I don't complain.

Besides I read this list like I read a newspaper: There is no need to read every reply. People concerned about the volume can subscribe to the daily digest.

Briefly, I like the system as it is.

spencer graves

Douglas Grove wrote:

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I was wondering if it is time to adopt a strategy a-la Splus help whereby people reply to the author and the author summarizes all the replies?




That might be a bit extreme, but it would be nice if people didn't
reply to the list (only to the authors) for very basic questions.

Most of us already know how to e.g. find the position of the largest element in a vector.

Doug

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help



______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Reply via email to