Hi Ben, On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:57:40AM -0400, Ben Bolker wrote: > > Just in case anyone cares or is hitting the same problem:
Any reason you choose to not install install the evailable package? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> apt-cache policy r-cran-mgcv r-cran-mgcv: Installed: 0.9.6-3 Candidate: 0.9.6-3 Version Table: 1.0.4-1 0 -1 http://basebud unstable/main Packages *** 0.9.6-3 0 500 http://basebud testing/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> > to install current mgcv (1.0-5) on 1.9.0 on Knoppix/Debian unstable I had > to: > > # cd /usr/lib > # ln -s /usr/lib/atlas/libblas.so.3 libblas-3.so > # ln -s /usr/lib/atlas/liblapack.so.3 liblapack-3.so > > Otherwise compilation couldn't find -lblas-3 or -llapack-3 The R package may need a recompilation if something changed w.r.t. to the libraries, though Camm is typically careful not to require this. I need to check this, unfortunately my main build machine is currently sick. > (I could have gotten away with the links in /usr/lib/atlas instead of > /usr/lib, as /usr/lib/atlas was listed in /etc/ld.so.conf) You should never need a fudge like this on Debian system. Something else is not right, and we need to fix that. Dirk -- The relationship between the computed price and reality is as yet unknown. -- From the pac(8) manual page ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html