It seems to me that a transformation is in order since [0,1] can't 
possibly contain a normal distribution without cutting off both tails.

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Rolf Turner wrote:

> 
> Darren Shaw wrote:
> 
> > this may be a simple question - but i would appreciate any thoughts
> > 
> > does anyone know how you would get one lower and one upper confidence 
> > interval for a set of data that consists of proportions.  i.e. taking a 
> > usual confidence interval for normal data would result in the lower 
> > confidence interval being negative - which is not possible given the data 
> > (which is constrained between 0 and 1)
> > 
> > i can see how you calculate a upper and lower confidence interval for a 
> > single proportion, but not for a set of proportions
> 
> 
> (1) Your question appears to be a bit ``off topic''.  I.e. it is
> really about statistical methodology, rather than about how to
> implement methodology in R.
> 
> (2) You need to make the scenario clearer.  What do your data
> actually consist of?  What are you assuming?
> 
> The only reasonable scenario that springs to mind (perhaps this is
> merely indicative of poverty of imagination on my part) is that you
> have a number of ***independent*** samples, each yielding a sample
> proportion, and each coming from the same population (or at least
> from populations having the same population proportion ``p''.  I.e.
> you have p.hat_1, ..., p.hat_n and from these you wish to calculate a
> confidence interval for p.
> 
> You need to know the sample ***sizes*** for each sample.  If you
> don't, you're screwed.  Full stop.  There is absolutely nothing
> sensible you can do.  If you ***do*** know the sample sizes (say k_1,
> ..., k_n) then the problem is trivial.
> 
> You have p.hat_j = x_j/k_j for j = 1, ..., n.
> 
> Let x = x_1 + ... + x_n  and k = k_1 + ... + k_n.
> 
> Form p.hat = x/k.  (I.e. you ***really*** just have one big
> happy sample.)  Then calculate the confidence interval for p
> in the usual way:
> 
>       p.hat +/- (z-value) * sqrt(p.hat * (1 - p.hat)/k)
> 
> If this is not the scenario with which you need to cope, then
> you'll have to explain what that scenario actually is.
> 
>                               cheers,
> 
>                                       Rolf Turner
>                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> 

-- 
Clint Bowman                    INTERNET:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Air Quality Modeler             INTERNET:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Ecology           VOICE:          (360) 407-6815
PO Box 47600                    FAX:            (360) 407-7534
Olympia, WA 98504-7600

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to