[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A.J. Rossini) writes: > I like SWIG (well, it facilitates wrappers for Python really well), > but it's not perfect. > > I've not delved into the difficulties in any detail yet, but we've had > problems with mixing SWIG and Boost.python for connections with Python > code -- and the Boost.python mechanism "feels" like DTL's RS<your > language here> code, where as SWIG doesn't quite have the same flavor. > > (sorry for failing on the details, but I'm doing something else > today).
Argh. To be clear, this is in the context of C++ systems. Which is relevant but completely different. -- Anthony Rossini Research Associate Professor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ Biomedical and Health Informatics University of Washington Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable FHCRC (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachme...{{dropped}} ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
