On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:02:02 -0400, Spencer Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, Duncan: > > Thanks much. I think I remember reading about both "all.equal" >and "identical" in Venables and Ripley (2002) MASS. Unfortunately, I >don't have MASS handy now, and I could not find it otherwise, so I asked. > > What needs to happen to upgrade the "all.equal" documentation to >add "identical" to the "see also"? I just did it. It was there in the text, but should also have been in see-also. In general to get something added to the docs, the best way is to collect a few similar things, classify them as doc errors, suggested improvements, etc, and post them to R-devel (if you're not sure they'll be accepted) or to R-bugs (if they are sure things). It's definitely best to submit suggested replacement text. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html