--- Patrick Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I definitely agree that focussing on what R does better than > other options is the right approach. One thing that Tomas > does not mention is graphics. Two possible selling points along > this line are: > > *) R is good for understanding your data with graphics. > *) R is good for producing graphics for publication. > > This discussion reminds me of something my wife says: classes > are for learning what people don't want to do -- if someone is > happy to do something, they don't need a class to force them to > do it. > > > Patrick Burns > > Burns Statistics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +44 (0)20 8525 0696 > http://www.burns-stat.com > (home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User") > Thanks! I agree. I have a web page demonstrating plotting West Nile virus infections in California at http://www.medepi.net/data/wnv/index.html
Tomas ===== Tomas Aragon, MD, DrPH, Director Center for Infectious Disease Preparedness UC Berkeley School of Public Health 1918 University Ave., 4th Fl., MC-7350 Berkeley, CA 94720-7350 http://www.idready.org ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
