I've searched on CRAN for axes, axis, and other terms
I've already forgotten, without (re)discovering the
reason for S using "non-joining" axes by default, instead
of box("l").
MASS points me towards Cleveland (1993) but I don't
have ready access to this any more. Could someone
give me a one-liner to justify this choice to a sceptic?
It's something to do with not mis-interpreting the axes
intersection as (0,0), isn't it?
TIA,
Simon
Simon Fear
Senior Statistician
Syne qua non Ltd
Tel: +44 (0) 1379 644449
Fax: +44 (0) 1379 644445
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.synequanon.com
Number of attachments included with this message: 0
This message (and any associated files) is confidential and\...{{dropped}}
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
