For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce "package()" and deprecate "library()"?
(well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate "=" for assignment, but that's hopeless). best, -tony On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:49:39 +0100, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Khomski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> on Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:20:03 +0100 writes: > > Pavel> this is a question, how can i specify the random part > Pavel> in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound > Pavel> matrices just in the the same way as they defined in > Pavel> the lme-Call (of the nlme library). > > ``twice in such a short paragraph -- yikes !!'' ... I'm getting > convulsive... > > There is NO lme4 library nor an nlme one ! > There's the lme4 *PACKAGE* and the nlme *PACKAGE* -- please -- > > (If the nlme package is built, it will rely on a nlme.so or > nlme.dll (or nlme.dylib ...) *library* of compiled C code, > and if packages are installed, > they are installed into a library of packages; > typically into one of the libraries in .libPaths() > ) > > whooh.... Martin > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > -- best, -tony "Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05). A.J. Rossini [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html